Southern California is grappling with a devastating wildfire crisis as dry, windy conditions fuel the rapid spread of flames, leaving more than a dozen people feared dead and forcing thousands to evacuate.
Firefighters are battling at least four major wildfires across the Los Angeles area, with the largest blaze, the Palisades Fire, scorching over 23,000 acres in Pacific Palisades. The fire has destroyed thousands of structures and is only 11% contained. Meanwhile, the Eaton Fire in Altadena has consumed more than 14,100 acres and stands at 15% containment. Over 100,000 residents are under mandatory evacuation orders.
The critical fire risk is expected to persist through Wednesday, putting over 8 million people in danger zones. Gusty Santa Ana winds, reaching up to 70 mph in mountain regions surrounding Los Angeles, combined with humidity levels as low as 10%, have created ideal conditions for the fires to thrive.
Red Flag Warnings and Air Quality Concerns
A red flag warning remains in effect for much of Southern California, emphasizing the ongoing threat to life and property. The South Coast Air Quality Management District has also extended its smoke advisory until Sunday night, warning of unhealthy air quality levels due to elevated PM2.5, a dangerous fine particulate matter.
“Smoke from the Palisades Fire and Eaton Fire is expected to most heavily impact coastal and central Los Angeles County on Saturday and Sunday,” the district stated, citing areas such as Malibu, Pacific Palisades, Altadena, Pasadena, and downtown Los Angeles as particularly affected.
Nearby counties, including Orange, San Bernardino, and Riverside, are also experiencing moderate to high air quality warnings, as smoke effects linger over the region.
Firefighting Efforts Continue
Thousands of firefighters are working tirelessly to contain the blazes and protect communities from further devastation. However, with no significant weather relief in sight, authorities are urging residents to remain vigilant and adhere to evacuation orders.
Credit: ABC News
In a landmark moment for American politics and law, President-elect Donald Trump was formally sentenced on Friday in his hush money case, becoming the first former president and major presidential candidate to stand trial as a criminal defendant. Despite his conviction, the judge declined to impose any penalties, leaving Trump free to return to the White House without the burden of a jail term or financial fines.
The case, which marked uncharted territory in U.S. legal history, is the only one among four criminal indictments against Trump to go to trial. It may remain the sole one to do so, further solidifying its historic significance.
In the aftermath of the sentencing, Trump took to his social media platform to denounce the proceedings. “Today’s event was a despicable charade, and now that it is over, we will appeal this Hoax, which has no merit, and restore the trust of Americans in our once great System of Justice,” he wrote in a lengthy post.
Outside the courthouse, the atmosphere was celebratory. Dozens of Trump supporters gathered, waving American flags and signs bearing his image. Many described the scene as a festive reunion, blending relief over the election victory with the news of no penalties in the case.
Jerry Gasowski, a retired power plant worker who traveled from Long Island, expressed his satisfaction with the outcome. “No penalty at all is great news. It’s great news for our country,” he said.
However, the proceedings were not without criticism. Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass condemned Trump’s repeated attacks on the legal system throughout the trial, calling his actions a deliberate attempt to erode public trust.
“The once and future President of the United States has engaged in a coordinated campaign to undermine its legitimacy,” Steinglass remarked in court.
As the legal battles surrounding Trump continue to unfold, Friday’s sentencing will likely remain a defining moment in his presidency and campaign.
Credit: AP
President-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday declined to commit to not using the U.S. military to take control of the Panama Canal, following his recent remarks about American expansion and the canal’s strategic importance.
During a press conference at Mar-a-Lago, Trump was asked about his stance on the canal and Greenland, both of which he has identified as areas of interest for U.S. territorial and economic expansion. When pressed by New York Times reporter David Sanger on whether he could assure the international community that military or economic coercion would not be used, Trump responded, “No. I’m not going to commit to that. It might be that you have to do something.”
Trump justified his position by highlighting the canal’s significance to U.S. interests. “The Panama Canal is vital to our country,” he stated. “It’s being operated by China, China. And we gave the Panama Canal to Panama, not to China.” He also described the canal as essential for U.S. economic and military security, asserting that it was initially built for U.S. military use.
No Assurances on Greenland or Panama
Trump admitted he could not rule out the use of military force concerning Greenland or Panama. “I can’t assure you on either of those two,” he said. However, he emphasized that he has not yet developed concrete plans, noting that his administration has not taken office.
When questioned about Canada, Trump ruled out military action but suggested he would use “economic force” if necessary, adding that the U.S. should not continue to protect its northern neighbor. “We don’t need anything they have,” he said.
Criticism of Jimmy Carter’s Panama Canal Deal
Trump used the opportunity to criticize former President Jimmy Carter, who brokered the Panama Canal Treaty in 1977, transferring control of the canal to Panama by the end of 1999. “Giving the Panama Canal is why Jimmy Carter lost the election, in my opinion,” Trump said, linking the treaty to Carter’s defeat.
Describing the canal’s handover as “a big mistake,” Trump argued that the deal undermined U.S. interests. “We gave it away for $1, but the deal was they have to treat us fairly,” he claimed, asserting that the U.S. faces unfair treatment and excessive charges for using the canal.
Trump also reflected on Carter’s legacy, calling him “a good man” but reiterating his belief that the canal’s transfer was a misstep. Carter, who passed away on December 29, is set to lie in state at the U.S. Capitol starting Tuesday.
Accusations Against China
The president-elect accused China of exploiting its growing influence in Panama, highlighting its investments and control over key ports. “China is running the canal,” he said, describing the situation as “a disgrace.” Trump argued that the U.S. must prioritize protecting its strategic interests and suggested that his administration would pursue policies to address perceived disadvantages in the current arrangement.
Source: The Hill
New York, Jan. 7 — A New York appeals court judge on Tuesday rejected President-elect Donald Trump’s latest attempt to delay his sentencing in a hush money case, setting the stage for the historic proceeding to take place as scheduled this Friday.
In a one-sentence ruling issued after an emergency hearing, Judge Ellen Gesmer denied Trump’s request for an immediate order to halt the sentencing while he appeals Judge Juan M. Merchan’s recent decision upholding his conviction. This marks the second legal setback for Trump in as many days after Merchan rejected a similar bid to indefinitely postpone the sentencing.
Despite these rulings, Trump retains the option to seek intervention from higher courts before the sentencing date.
At the heart of the case is Trump’s argument that, as president-elect, he enjoys the same immunity from criminal proceedings as a sitting president. Trump’s lawyer, Todd Blanche, reiterated this position during Tuesday’s hearing, calling the sentencing during the presidential transition “unconstitutional” and a potential disruption to the incoming administration.
However, Manhattan prosecutors, represented by Steven Wu, have countered this claim, emphasizing the principle of “one president at a time” and the importance of bringing finality to criminal proceedings.
Trump, convicted last May on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, could face a range of penalties, including a fine, probation, or up to four years in prison. The charges stem from allegations that Trump orchestrated a scheme to conceal a hush money payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels during his 2016 presidential campaign. Trump has denied Daniels’ allegations and maintained his innocence throughout the trial.
Judge Merchan, in a ruling last week, rejected Trump’s plea to dismiss the case on the grounds of presidential immunity, stating that Trump’s current status as president-elect does not exempt him from criminal sentencing. Merchan has indicated a willingness to accommodate the presidential transition by allowing Trump to appear at Friday’s sentencing virtually, rather than in person.
Blanche has signaled intentions to challenge Merchan’s rulings further, potentially escalating the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. The defense has also raised concerns about the implications of the Supreme Court’s previous ruling granting sitting presidents broad immunity from prosecution, arguing that similar protections should extend to a president-elect during the transition period.
Manhattan prosecutors have urged the court to proceed with sentencing as scheduled, citing the public interest in concluding the case promptly.
As Trump prepares for his second inauguration on Jan. 20, his legal challenges remain unprecedented. If sentenced before taking office, Trump would become the first U.S. president to enter the White House with a criminal conviction.
Judge Merchan has suggested that an unconditional discharge — a resolution without jail time, fines, or probation — might be appropriate given the circumstances. However, Trump’s defense team continues to argue for dismissal of the conviction entirely.
The outcome of Friday’s proceedings could set a significant precedent for the legal boundaries of presidential immunity and the accountability of public officials.
Credit: Associated Press
In a landmark move set to impact millions of Americans, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has finalized a rule to eliminate medical debt from consumer credit reports. Announced on Tuesday, the new regulation will wipe an estimated $49 billion in unpaid medical bills from the credit histories of approximately 15 million Americans.
This groundbreaking change is expected to improve borrowers’ credit scores by an average of 20 points, potentially enabling access to critical financial opportunities such as mortgages, car loans, and small-business financing.
Vice President Kamala Harris praised the rule as a transformative step toward financial equity. “No one should be denied economic opportunity because they got sick or experienced a medical emergency,” Harris said in a statement. She initially proposed the rule in June 2024 alongside CFPB Director Rohit Chopra.
“This will be life-changing for millions of families, making it easier for them to be approved for a car loan, a home loan, or a small-business loan,” Harris added.
While major credit reporting agencies have already begun voluntarily removing medical debt from credit reports, the CFPB’s rule cements the practice into law. The regulation is scheduled to take effect in March, though it may face delays due to potential legal challenges from the debt collection industry.
Groups such as the Association of Credit and Collection Professionals have voiced opposition to the measure, arguing it could diminish accountability for unpaid bills. “This will result in reduced consequences for not paying your bills, which in turn will reduce access to credit and health care for those that need it most,” the group stated.
Despite these objections, proponents of the rule highlight its potential to provide financial relief for millions of Americans burdened by medical debt, a factor often beyond their control. The regulation marks a significant step toward mitigating the economic fallout of unexpected medical emergencies.
Source: GMA
Ottawa, Canada – In a dramatic announcement that marks the end of a transformative nine-year tenure, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has declared his resignation as leader of the Liberal Party. Trudeau will continue serving as prime minister until his party selects a successor through a competitive nationwide process.
The announcement, made from his Rideau Cottage residence, follows a period of growing discontent within the Liberal Party, which has been trailing significantly behind the opposition Conservatives in national polls. Trudeau cited the internal strife and the need for a unified party heading into Canada’s next general election, slated for October, as key factors in his decision.
“Every morning I’ve woken up as prime minister, I’ve been inspired by the resilience, the generosity, and the determination of Canadians,” Trudeau stated during his address. “It has become clear to me that if I am having to fight internal battles, I cannot be the best option in that election.”
A Tumultuous End to a Transformative Leadership
First elected prime minister in 2015, Trudeau’s tenure was marked by landmark policies, including efforts to strengthen the middle class, advance reconciliation with Indigenous peoples, defend free trade, and champion climate change initiatives. His leadership was also tested during global crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
However, recent events have fueled unrest within the Liberal Party. Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland’s unexpected resignation in December, reportedly over differences with Trudeau regarding U.S. President-elect Donald Trump’s proposed 25% tariffs on Canadian goods, intensified the party’s internal divisions.
Trudeau acknowledged these challenges, emphasizing his love for Canada and the importance of providing voters with a clear choice in the upcoming election. “Canadians deserve a real choice in the next election,” he said.
The Path Forward
With Trudeau’s resignation, the Liberal Party faces the critical task of selecting a new leader capable of rallying the party and restoring its popularity ahead of the general election. The party has announced plans for a robust leadership contest to determine his successor.
Despite the challenges, Trudeau expressed confidence in Canada’s future and the resilience of its citizens. “Since 2015, I’ve fought for this country, for you, to strengthen and grow the middle class… to fight climate change and get our economy ready for the future,” he remarked.
As Trudeau prepares to step down, he leaves a complex legacy that will likely shape Canadian politics for years to come. The focus now shifts to the Liberal Party’s leadership race and the country’s path toward the October election.
Credit: Independent.co.uk
The US Surgeon General, Dr. Vivek Murthy, has issued an urgent advisory warning Americans about the significant cancer risks associated with alcohol consumption. This advisory, released on Friday, calls for updated health warning labels on alcoholic beverages to raise public awareness of the dangers.
A Critical Health Message
Surgeon General advisories are rare and reserved for health crises that demand immediate attention. Past advisories, such as the 1964 report on smoking, have marked pivotal moments in public health. Dr. Murthy’s report aims to dispel long-held misconceptions about alcohol’s safety, emphasizing its role as a preventable cause of cancer.
“Alcohol is responsible for approximately 100,000 cancer cases and 20,000 cancer deaths annually in the US,” said Dr. Murthy. “This is greater than the 13,500 alcohol-related traffic fatalities each year, yet most Americans remain unaware of this risk.”
A 2019 survey by the American Institute for Cancer Research found that only 45% of Americans recognized alcohol as a cancer-causing agent. This lack of awareness persists despite robust evidence linking alcohol consumption to at least seven types of cancer, including breast, liver, and colorectal cancers.
The Science Behind the Warning
Alcohol’s harmful effects extend beyond general health concerns, with cancer risks beginning even at low levels of consumption. It is metabolized into acetaldehyde, a chemical that damages DNA, and creates free radicals that further increase cancer risks. Alcohol also disrupts hormonal balances and depletes protective nutrients like B vitamins.
Dr. Béatrice Lauby-Secretan of the International Agency for Cancer Research highlighted the compounding risks when alcohol interacts with other carcinogens, such as those in tobacco. “It’s no longer two plus two equals four. It’s two plus two equals six,” she said, emphasizing the synergistic dangers.
Gender-Specific Risks
The advisory also points to heightened risks for women, who are more vulnerable to alcohol-related cancers due to smaller body sizes and higher fat content, which amplifies alcohol’s effects. Women who consume even one drink daily face a 19% lifetime risk of developing alcohol-related cancer, compared to 11% for men.
Shifting Social Attitudes
The Surgeon General’s report arrives amidst growing trends toward moderation. Nonalcoholic beverages and “dry January” campaigns have gained traction, signaling a cultural shift toward reduced alcohol consumption.
Dr. David Greenberg, chief of hematology and oncology at Hackensack Meridian Jersey Shore University Medical Center, expressed hope for increased awareness. “It’s remarkable how many people are unaware of how dangerous and toxic alcohol can be,” he said.
A Call to Action
Dr. Murthy’s advisory urges Americans to reconsider their drinking habits and advocates for clear, updated warning labels on alcoholic beverages. While complete abstinence may be unrealistic for some, experts agree that moderation is crucial.
“There is no safe amount of alcohol,” Dr. Murthy stated emphatically. His call for immediate action aims to educate the public and potentially reshape America’s relationship with alcohol, prioritizing health over misconceptions.
Sources: CNN, US Surgeon General’s Office
New Orleans, LA—In the early hours of New Year’s Day, a man drove a pickup truck into a crowded Bourbon Street, killing 10 people and injuring over 30 others in what officials suspect to be an act of terrorism. The driver, identified as 42-year-old Shamsud-Din Jabbar, a U.S. citizen from Texas, was fatally shot in a gunfire exchange with police.
The FBI confirmed that an Islamic State (ISIS) flag was recovered from the vehicle used in the attack. Investigators are working to determine Jabbar’s “potential associations and affiliations with terrorist organizations.”
New Orleans Police Department Superintendent Anne Kirkpatrick described the act as “very intentional behavior.” Witnesses reported that the truck broke through barricades and sped down the iconic street filled with New Year’s revelers. The suspect opened fire on responding officers before being neutralized.
“This man was trying to run over as many people as he could,” Kirkpatrick said. Two officers sustained gunshot wounds but are reported to be in stable condition.
Federal Investigation Underway
Mayor LaToya Cantrell labeled the event as a likely “terrorist attack.” The FBI has launched an investigation into potential connections between Jabbar and foreign terror organizations. Law enforcement sources revealed that a flag resembling that of ISIS was flown from the truck. However, no group has claimed responsibility, and it remains unclear if Jabbar acted alone.
A long gun with a silencer and body armor were recovered from the scene. Potential explosive devices found nearby are being analyzed.
Officials Respond
President Joe Biden condemned the attack, calling it “unjustifiable violence,” and promised full federal support. Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry described the incident as a “horrific act of violence,” urging people to avoid the French Quarter while authorities investigate.
The Sugar Bowl football game, set to take place at the Superdome later today, will proceed with heightened security measures, according to Kirkpatrick.
Witness Accounts
Jim and Nicole Mowrer, tourists from Iowa, recounted the chaos. They described the truck crashing into barricades at high speed, followed by gunfire. “We stayed in an alcove until it was safe and then tried to help, but unfortunately, some victims had already succumbed to their injuries,” Nicole Mowrer said.
Safety Measures and Preparedness
This attack has brought attention to longstanding concerns about safety in the French Quarter. A 2017 city memo identified the area as vulnerable to mass casualty incidents and outlined plans to enhance surveillance and barriers.
New Orleans’ Bourbon Street became the site of a horrific tragedy in the early hours of New Year’s Day as a driver plowed into a crowd of revelers in what authorities have confirmed was a “terrorist attack”. The devastating incident, which occurred at approximately 3:15 a.m. near the intersection of Bourbon Street and Iberville, claimed the lives of at least 10 people and left dozens more injured.
According to officials, the driver exited the vehicle and fired a weapon following the collision, further escalating the chaos. Emergency responders rushed to the scene, transporting approximately 30 injured individuals to five hospitals across the city. A significant police and emergency services presence remains in the area.
“There has been a mass casualty incident on Canal and Bourbon Street. Get yourself away from the area,” NOLA Ready, the city’s emergency preparedness agency, warned on social media.
Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry described the incident as “a horrific act of violence” and urged the public to pray for the victims and first responders. “Sharon and I are deeply saddened by this senseless attack,” he said, encouraging residents and visitors to avoid the area as investigations continue.
The New Orleans Police Department and city officials have yet to confirm the total number of victims involved in the attack. The incident has cast a dark shadow over the city’s New Year’s celebrations and left many shaken in its aftermath.
This story is developing. Stay tuned for updates.
Credit: FOX News
#NewOrleans #TerrorAttack #BreakingNews #BourbonStreet #MassCasualty
Photo: Daily Mail
After more than a decade on the market, Michael Jordan’s legendary Chicago-area mansion has finally sold for $9.5 million. While the sale marks the end of a 12-year journey, the price is a significant drop from its original $29 million listing in 2012—a steep markdown for one of the most unique properties in luxury real estate.
Known as Legend Point, the 56,000-square-foot Highland Park estate is a tribute to Jordan’s illustrious career and personal style. Built in 1991 during his Chicago Bulls prime, the home sits on seven acres and features nine bedrooms, 17 bathrooms, a putting green, a tennis court, a cigar lounge, and a regulation-size basketball court. A standout feature includes doors salvaged from the original Playboy Mansion.
The mansion’s listing creatively nodded to Jordan’s legacy. By 2015, the price was reduced to $14.855 million, a figure that adds up to Jordan’s iconic jersey number, #23, which also adorns the estate’s front gates. Despite the property’s unparalleled amenities and connection to the basketball legend, it struggled to attract buyers—a challenge many attributed to its deeply personal design, which made it difficult for potential buyers to envision as their own.
Jordan reportedly invested $50 million to build the home from scratch, crafting a space that’s been described as “as legendary as His Airness himself.” However, the high level of customization may have also contributed to the lengthy sale process. The new owner, whose identity remains unknown, now faces the task of transforming the estate into something less synonymous with Jordan’s larger-than-life persona.
While the final sale price is a win for the buyer, it’s no loss for Jordan, who relocated to Florida years ago. Earlier this year, he purchased a $16.5 million mansion in Jupiter, marking his second property in the exclusive community. For the six-time NBA champion and global icon, patience and a diversified real estate portfolio appear to have paid off.
Legend Point may no longer belong to Jordan, but its legacy as a symbol of his greatness remains intact. For the new owner, it’s more than just a house—it’s a piece of history.
Credit: Benzinga, Daily Mail
More than a dozen U.S. universities have issued guidance to their international students, advising them to return to campus before the January 20, 2025, inauguration of President-elect Donald Trump. The move comes amid heightened concerns over potential immigration policy changes under the incoming administration.
President-elect Trump has consistently voiced hardline stances on immigration, including threats of mass deportations and the revocation of legal immigration statuses. His past actions, such as the implementation of a travel ban during his first term, left thousands stranded and raised alarm among international communities. Recently, Trump reiterated plans to revoke student visas for individuals he deems “radical anti-American and antisemitic.”
Cornell University highlighted the urgency in a notice directed at its international students, particularly those from nations such as Nigeria, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria, and Venezuela. “The immigration landscape is likely to change under the new presidential administration,” the statement read, emphasizing the need for students to be proactive about their status and documentation.
Wesleyan University echoed these sentiments, urging students to arrive in the U.S. before January 19 to avoid potential complications with re-entry. “With uncertainties around President-elect Donald Trump’s plans for immigration-related policy, the safest way to avoid difficulty is to be physically present in the U.S.,” the university advised.
In the 2023-24 academic year, U.S. universities welcomed a record 1.1 million international students, a testament to the country’s reputation as a global education hub. However, the incoming administration’s rhetoric has cast a shadow of uncertainty over this population.
Harvard University also addressed student concerns, advising international students to “budget time ahead of the semester start” and prepare for possible delays or disruptions.
Institutions such as Johns Hopkins University, Yale University, MIT, and the University of Southern California have issued similar statements, urging students to travel with additional documentation proving their connection to their respective colleges.
Source: KXAN Austin
BUFFALO, N.Y.— A 75-year-old man who believed he was an only child his entire life recently uncovered an extraordinary truth: he has one half-sister and four half-brothers.
Dixon Handshaw’s discovery began in August when he ordered his pre-adoption certificate and learned the name of his biological father, Robert “Bud” Romig. A Google search led him to Romig’s obituary, revealing not only their striking resemblance but also a family Handshaw never knew he had.
The retired Buffalo native described the series of events as a “Christmas miracle.”
“I had great adoptive parents. They were wonderful. I love them and I miss them, but I always wanted siblings,” Handshaw told CNN. “I thought one or two would be great. I got six!”
A Life-Altering Discovery
Handshaw, who was adopted as an infant, learned that his biological father had been a physics graduate student at Cornell University and his mother a secretary in the same department. His biological mother never had more children, but his father went on to have five children and adopt three others in Rochester, N.Y.
Taking a leap of faith, Handshaw reached out to Gary Romig, one of his father’s adopted sons.
“I chose Gary because I knew he was adopted, and I thought he would be empathetic to my situation,” Handshaw explained.
Romig, caught off guard but receptive, vividly recalls the moment he received the unexpected phone call.
“I was eating my lunch in my car at a job site, and I got a phone call from an unfamiliar number. Normally, I wouldn’t answer, but for some reason, I did,” Romig told WHAM. “He says, ‘Hi, my name is Dixon. Are you Gary Romig?’ I said, ‘I am.’ He goes, ‘I’m your brother.’ I was stunned.”
A Warm Welcome
Handshaw’s photo, shared by Romig with their siblings, left no doubt—his resemblance to their late father was uncanny. A few days later, Handshaw boarded a flight to Rochester, where he met his siblings in person for the first time.
The emotional reunion took place on Dec. 20, followed by a larger family gathering the next day, where Handshaw met 55 relatives.
“It’s so special because he’s so emotional and excited,” his half-sister Wendy Gell told WHAM. “We’re welcoming him with open arms into our family.”
Building New Bonds
Although Handshaw won’t be spending Christmas Day with his newfound family, they’ve already begun planning future gatherings, including a camping trip this summer. The siblings have also started a group text to stay connected.
For Handshaw, who has no children of his own, the joy of finding siblings has been overwhelming.
“I couldn’t be happier,” he said. “I always wanted to be part of a larger family, and now I am.”
What started as a simple search for answers has turned into the ultimate Christmas gift—a family.
Credit: People
In a significant development, special prosecutor Kari Morrissey announced on Monday the withdrawal of her appeal in the Alec Baldwin involuntary manslaughter case. The decision follows the New Mexico attorney general’s office’s indication that it would not pursue the appeal aggressively.
The case stemmed from the tragic October 2021 death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins, who was fatally shot during the filming of Rust. Baldwin, who discharged the firearm while preparing for a scene, was accused of being reckless and criminally negligent.
During the trial in July, Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer dismissed the case on its third day, citing the prosecution’s failure to turn over critical evidence—a cache of bullets—to the defense. The judge criticized Morrissey’s case management, describing it as “so near to bad faith as to show signs of scorching.”
Baldwin’s legal team argued that the withheld evidence could have supported his defense, while Morrissey maintained that the evidence was irrelevant and accused the defense of misleading the court. However, without the attorney general’s full support, Morrissey stated that the prosecution’s ability to proceed was compromised.
In response to the appeal’s dismissal, Baldwin’s attorneys, Alex Spiro and Luke Nikas, expressed relief, calling the decision a vindication. “This was an unspeakable tragedy, but Alec Baldwin committed no crime,” they said.
Hutchins’ family in Ukraine opposed the withdrawal but is continuing to pursue a civil case against Baldwin and the film’s producers. The family also established the Halyna Hutchins Foundation to advocate for film set safety protocols.
Morrissey, who secured a guilty verdict against the film’s armorer, Hannah Gutierrez Reed, lamented the outcome. “We regret that Mr. Baldwin will not be held accountable for the role he played in Halyna Hutchins’ death,” she stated, expressing hope that the civil lawsuits will bring some justice to Hutchins’ family.
Santa Fe District Attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies commended Morrissey’s efforts and acknowledged the ongoing debate over accountability in the Rust tragedy. “Halyna’s tragic death has prompted industry-wide scrutiny of safety protocols, especially regarding firearms and live ammunition on set,” she said.
Gutierrez Reed is currently serving an 18-month sentence for involuntary manslaughter. Meanwhile, the dismissal of charges against Baldwin continues to stir discussions about justice and safety in the film industry.
Credit: Variety
In a dramatic Christmas Eve reaction, President-elect Donald Trump took to Truth Social to denounce President Joe Biden’s decision to commute the death sentences of 37 federal prisoners. The announcement, made Monday, replaces the death penalty for nearly all federal prisoners on death row with life imprisonment.
Biden, who has maintained a moratorium on federal executions throughout his administration, defended his decision, stating that it aligns with his administration’s principles. “These commutations are consistent with the moratorium my administration has imposed on federal executions, in cases other than terrorism and hate-motivated mass murder,” Biden explained in his statement.
The decision sparked mixed reactions, with some commentators suggesting that Biden acted out of concern that Trump’s incoming administration might resume federal executions. Trump, however, expressed outrage over the move, claiming it disregarded the gravity of the crimes committed.
“Joe Biden just commuted the Death Sentence on 37 of the worst killers in our Country,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “When you hear the acts of each, you won’t believe that he did this. Makes no sense. Relatives and friends are further devastated. They can’t believe this is happening!”
Biden’s action leaves only three individuals on federal death row whose sentences remain unchanged, with the president citing exceptions for cases involving terrorism and hate-motivated mass murders.
As the debate continues, Biden’s decision underscores the growing national divide on the death penalty, which remains a contentious issue in the U.S. judicial system. While advocacy groups have praised the move as a step toward criminal justice reform, critics like Trump argue it undermines justice for the victims and their families.
The controversy is likely to dominate conversations in the lead-up to Trump’s presidency, raising questions about the future of federal executions in the United States.
Credit: Raw Story
Celebrated actor Denzel Washington, 69, has taken a significant step in his spiritual journey, adding “minister” to his long list of accomplishments. On Saturday, the Academy Award-winning actor was baptized at Kelly Temple in New York City and received his minister’s license in a heartfelt ceremony that marked a new chapter in his life.
During the service, Washington addressed the congregation, sharing his journey of faith. “It took a while, but I’m finally here,” he said, as quoted by Archbishop Christopher Bryant. He encouraged attendees, stating, “If [God] can do this for me, there’s nothing He can’t do for you. The sky literally is the limit.”
Washington’s wife of 41 years, Pauletta Washington, expressed her pride and admiration for her husband’s commitment to his faith. “Forty-six years later, here I’m still standing next to him as only God will have it,” she said. “You are the head of our house, and you have set a great example for our children, who are now adult children who know the difference because we have shown them the difference.”
The actor, casually dressed in a gray T-shirt and black sweatpants, was visibly emotional during the ceremony. Afterward, he posed with his minister’s license and baptism certificate, symbolizing his renewed dedication to his faith.
This momentous event follows Washington’s candid remarks on religion during an interview with Esquire in November. Reflecting on his spiritual journey and the challenges of openly discussing faith in Hollywood, he said, “When you see me, you see the best I could do with what I’ve been given by my Lord and Savior. I’m unafraid.”
Washington went on to challenge the perception of Hollywood as a monolithic entity. “What does [Hollywood] even mean? That to me means a street called Hollywood Boulevard. It’s not like we all meet somewhere and discuss what we believe,” he remarked.
As one of Hollywood’s most revered actors, Washington’s baptism and ordination have added a new dimension to his life’s narrative, inspiring his family and fans alike with his unwavering faith and commitment to service.
This story is based on original reporting by Page Six.
Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and his fiancée, Lauren Sanchez, are reportedly set to exchange vows in a grand winter wonderland-themed wedding in Aspen, Colorado, next Saturday. The extravagant ceremony is rumored to cost $600 million, according to reports by the Daily Mail.
The couple, who announced their engagement in May 2023, have kept their wedding plans under wraps but are said to be preparing for a star-studded event. Leading up to the nuptials, the pair reportedly hosted a private celebration at Matsuhisa, an exclusive sushi restaurant, which they reserved for Thursday and Friday.
The wedding is expected to exude holiday charm, complete with festive decor and twinkling lights. High-profile guests, including Bill Gates, Leonardo DiCaprio, and Queen Rania of Jordan, who previously celebrated the couple’s engagement in Positano, Italy, are anticipated to attend.
Despite the buzz, Bezos, 60, and Sanchez, 54, have not publicly confirmed the wedding date. Representatives for the couple were unavailable for comment.
A Love Story Spanning Years
The billionaire entrepreneur and former broadcast journalist began dating in 2018, making their relationship public the following year after Bezos announced his divorce from MacKenzie Scott. Sanchez, who was separated from Hollywood talent agent Patrick Whitesell at the time, shares two children, Ella, 16, and Evan, 18, with Whitesell, as well as a 23-year-old son, Nikko, with ex-NFL player Tony Gonzalez.
Rumors of the couple’s engagement had been circulating since December 2019, when Sanchez was spotted wearing a massive heart-shaped ring. Bezos officially proposed aboard his mega-yacht last year, presenting her with a cushion-cut pink diamond valued at $2.5 million.
Credit: New York Post
As the U.S. braces for the impact of sweeping tariffs proposed by President-elect Donald Trump, Americans are rushing to purchase cars, appliances, and other big-ticket imports. This spending frenzy, driven by fears of price hikes, could ironically exacerbate inflation—the very issue consumers hope to avoid.
Trump’s administration has announced plans to impose tariffs of up to 60% on Chinese imports and 25% on goods from Mexico and Canada, targeting the country’s three largest trading partners. These policies, expected to take effect early next year, have already prompted significant shifts in consumer behavior.
Consumers Fast-Track Purchases
Recent data shows a surge in spending, with Americans shelling out $3.6 billion more on vehicles and auto parts in November compared to the previous month. Similarly, electronics and appliances saw increased sales, driven by fears of impending cost spikes and repairs necessitated by Hurricane Helene.
“It’s clear that people are buying ahead,” said Diane Swonk, chief economist at KPMG. “The more you buy, the more you push up prices in anticipation of price increases.”
Deena Pryor, a Florida resident, expedited her car and appliance purchases following the election. “It just kind of clicked after the election,” said Pryor, 42. “We should go ahead and buy now.”
The trend extends to retailers, with outlets like AAA Appliances in Virginia reporting a sharp increase in sales. Owner Robert Pearson noted a quadrupling in demand for refrigerators and other household goods. However, he expressed concern about absorbing costs and ensuring customers aren’t overwhelmed by price hikes.
Inflation on the Horizon
Although inflation has cooled to 2.7% from a peak of 9.1%, federal data indicates November saw notable price increases for appliances and vehicles. Experts warn this could intensify once tariffs are implemented.
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome H. Powell acknowledged the uncertainty surrounding the economic impact of the proposed tariffs. “We don’t know what will be tariffed, from what countries, for how long,” Powell said, emphasizing the challenges in predicting consumer price effects.
Retailers and Small Businesses Brace for Impact
Major retailers like Costco, Walmart, and Lowe’s are also preparing for potential price surges. Costco is accelerating inventory purchases, while Walmart and Best Buy warn that increased import fees could drive up costs for everyday goods.
Small businesses, however, face a tougher challenge. Michael Spadaro, co-founder of Cork & Mill, noted that many smaller enterprises lack the capital to stockpile inventory, leaving them vulnerable to price hikes.
Economic Strain on Households
Analysts estimate the proposed tariffs could cost U.S. households an average of $3,000 annually, with low- and middle-income families bearing the brunt. These groups are less likely to have the resources to preemptively purchase goods, making them particularly susceptible to the financial strain.
For some, like Kristen Scalise in Philadelphia, the race to beat tariffs has meant reprioritizing purchases. “Literally the morning after the election, my first thought was: I’ve got to buy a refrigerator; I can’t wait until next year,” Scalise said.
Credit: Washington
U.S. President-elect Donald Trump has issued a stark warning to the European Union, stating that the bloc could face steep tariffs if it does not address its trade deficit with the United States by significantly increasing oil and gas imports.
In a post on Truth Social, Trump said, “I told the European Union that they must make up their tremendous deficit with the United States by the large-scale purchase of our oil and gas. Otherwise, it is TARIFFS all the way!!!”
Trump has long criticized countries with trade surpluses with the U.S. and has pledged to impose tariffs on major trading partners, including Canada, Mexico, and China. Europe, he argues, has benefited from a longstanding trade surplus with the U.S. and must now “pay a heavy price.”
However, industry experts note that European oil and gas purchases are dictated by market forces rather than government intervention. Refineries, owned by private oil majors and trading houses, typically prioritize cost-efficiency and price competitiveness when sourcing resources.
As Trump prepares to take office on January 20, his aggressive trade policies are poised to redefine the U.S. relationship with its trading partners. The EU may soon face tough decisions on balancing economic ties with the United States against the realities of global energy markets.
Credit: CNBC
In a significant milestone for US immigration enforcement, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency deported 271,484 immigrants during the last fiscal year, according to a newly released annual report. This figure marks the highest level of deportations since 2014 and underscores the challenges facing immigration policymakers amid record global migration.
The report, covering the period from October 1, 2023, to September 30, 2024, revealed that a substantial portion of deportations involved individuals who crossed the US-Mexico border illegally. Acting ICE Director Patrick Lechleitner highlighted the agency’s efforts, stating, “Throughout the year, the agency was called on to do more without commensurate funding, working within the confines of strained resources and competing priorities.”
Biden Administration’s Immigration Policy
The Biden administration exceeded deportation numbers from its previous two years, focusing primarily on public safety and national security threats. This approach aligns with ICE’s revised guidelines under President Biden, which prioritized enforcement measures targeting immigrants posing risks to national security, border security, or public safety.
Of the 271,484 deportations, approximately 32% involved individuals with criminal histories. Meanwhile, ICE’s enforcement and removal branch reported 113,431 arrests, down from the previous year. Of those arrested, 81,312 were either convicted criminals or had pending criminal charges.
ICE’s latest report also revealed that the agency managed over 7.6 million immigrants in removal proceedings or with final orders of removal on what is known as the non-detained docket. These individuals remain in the US and are navigating the immigration process outside of ICE custody.
Challenges Ahead for Immigration Enforcement
The report’s release comes as President-elect Donald Trump prepares to implement sweeping immigration reforms, making mass deportation a cornerstone of his administration. However, Trump’s plans are expected to encounter similar challenges faced by Biden and his predecessors, including limited resources and personnel within key immigration agencies.
“There’s a difference between arresting people and deporting people,” a former Department of Homeland Security official explained. “Unless there’s a significant change in the immigration process, deportation requires some form of legal proceedings.”
Notably, ICE’s report also highlighted diplomatic efforts under Biden’s leadership to increase the number of accepted removal flights and negotiate with countries, including China, to facilitate deportations.
Historical Context
While the Biden administration’s deportation figures are significant, they fall short of the approximately 400,000 deportations carried out in one year under former President Barack Obama. However, many of Obama’s deportations involved recent border crossers, a less complex process compared to targeting individuals already residing in the US.
The rising numbers reflect ongoing struggles to address migration surges and enforce immigration laws amid strained resources and evolving priorities. As the Trump administration gears up to expand immigration enforcement, it faces the dual challenge of policy implementation and operational capacity.
Credit: CNN
The Georgia Court of Appeals ruled on Thursday that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis must be removed from the 2020 election interference case against President-elect Donald Trump. This decision overturns a prior ruling by a trial judge that allowed Willis to remain on the case.
The case stems from allegations that Trump and more than a dozen allies orchestrated a scheme to overturn Georgia’s 2020 election results. Trump, who has maintained his innocence, pleaded not guilty to the charges brought against him last year by Fulton County prosecutors.
In its majority opinion, the appellate court concluded that the trial court erred by failing to disqualify Willis and her office. The court emphasized that Willis’ involvement created an “appearance of impropriety” that undermined public confidence in the proceedings.
“Disqualification is mandated, and no other remedy will suffice to restore public confidence in the integrity of these proceedings,” the court stated in its 2-1 ruling. However, the court left the indictment against Trump and his co-defendants intact. The case is expected to be reassigned to the Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council of Georgia.
Controversy Surrounding DA Willis
The ruling comes after allegations of a romantic relationship between Willis and Nathan Wade, a special prosecutor she hired in November 2021 to assist with the investigation. Earlier this year, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee held an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the relationship constituted a conflict of interest.
McAfee ultimately allowed Willis to remain on the case, provided that Wade stepped aside, which he did. However, Trump and eight co-defendants appealed the decision, citing concerns over Willis’ judgment and impartiality.
The allegations were first raised by Michael Roman, a co-defendant and GOP operative, who claimed Willis and Wade’s relationship began before Wade’s appointment and that Willis financially benefited from their connection. Both Willis and Wade admitted to the relationship but denied any wrongdoing, asserting that it began after Wade’s hiring and ended last summer.
Fallout from the Ruling
While McAfee’s earlier ruling criticized Willis for what he described as a “tremendous lapse in judgment,” the appellate court’s decision underscores the lasting impact of the controversy. The judge had noted an “odor of mendacity” surrounding Willis’ testimony, which he described as unprofessional.
The appellate court’s decision marks a significant development in the high-profile case, which has faced numerous legal and political challenges. Trump, who defeated Vice President Kamala Harris in the November presidential election, is set to be sworn in for a second term on January 20.
Credit: CBS News
